As we are contributing (or we should be) to our g-osc community, our g-osc wiki or open source communities in general The visualization done using Processing.js should be something related or useful to our goc-wiki even if its simple. If I implemented anything non-related and i posted it on the g-osc visualisation page then whats the point? I looked at the webpages on the our g-osc wiki website. I looked at the what was aready there on g-osc viualisations page and I kept thinking about what do i do . I was quite late in starting on this, I was doing other work. Until now, something did not show up on mind that was different from what others did and that has any use even if its little to our g-osc community. So, i still have not done anything on it
Exploring the feedback command done in the tutorial was interesting. As you face a problem, not knowing how to get to the solution means that you’ll have to search within the resources available to you until you get to it. Me myself, when i face any problem in programming or any other i just go surf the web searching until i get the solution or how to reach it. We almost found what we need to do the command except that we haven’t got how to extract the author’s email from the command chosen by the user for feedback or what function or method to use for it. When the function you need is present its better if you got it than implementing it as this will be useless and wastes you time. Also its one of the concepts used in open source communities.